Code security, built for the
way is written now.

Goosy reads every pull request and your whole codebase, proves which findings
are real, and writes the fix — for your team and for the agents on it.

Get Started$npm i -g goosy@latest
Goosy dashboard preview

Works where your code already lives

GitHubGitLabCursorClaude CodeCodexBitbucketMCPVisual Studio Code

HOW IT WORKS

Connect once.
Goosy does the hard part.

Four steps, one engine. Each run only when the last earns it, so what reaches you is
short, real, and already fixed.

Scan Repo — whole codebase scan

Read the whole codebase, not just the diff.

Every pull request is analyzed in the context of your entire codebase — not in isolation.

Chase only what looks real — verified high signal

Chase only what looks real.

Broad checks narrow the field first, so the deep work runs where it actually matters.

Proven twice before you hear about it

Proven twice before you hear about it.

Every finding is independently re-checked. Weak signals are filtered before they become alerts.

Ship the fix — before vulnerable and after patched with patch summary

Ship the fix, not just the finding.

Confirmed issues arrive as a reviewable patch. You approve, Goosy merges. Your main branch stays yours.

BUILT FOR PRODUCTION

High availability

Unkey deploys multiple replicas in different zones so your app survives surges during outages.

Proactive protection

Take immediate control over your secrets with the ability to instantly revoke access, providing swift response to potential threats.

■ SURFACES

Your engineering team already has
a workflow. Goosy simply joins it.

The same engine on the pull request, in your terminal, inside your coding agent, and in one view your whole team shares. Same findings, same proof, wherever you need it.

Try it live

Every pull request, reviewed before merge.

Goosy reads the change against your whole repository and comments on the exact line, with a fix you can commit without leaving GitHub.

installgithub.com/apps/goosy
GitHub — Every pull request, reviewed
before merge.

Every change ships
through one path.

Plan, code, test, review, merge, deploy. All of it funnels
through one narrow gate: review.

Pipeline stages from plan to deploy with the review bottleneck highlighted

WHAT WE CATCH

Not a list of rules.
An understanding of your code.

Grouped the way failures actually happen. Every check reads your whole repository for
context, and every finding is confirmed twice before it reaches you.

Untrusted input that reaches
somewhere it should never reach.

Anything a caller controls, from a query param to an uploaded file,
followed all the way to the place it finally gets used.

INJECTION & INPUT — Untrusted input that reaches somewhere it should never reach.
SQL injectionNoSQL injectionCommand injectionRemote code executionTemplate injectionXML external entitiesCross-site scriptingPath traversalServer-side request forgeryInsecure deserializationUnsafe file uploadCatastrophic regex backtrackingMissing input validation
WHY IT MATTERS

SQL injection gets a dedicated pass of its own. Every candidate is re-examined against a strict checklist before it is allowed to reach you.

Doors that open for the wrong person.

The bugs that pass every test, because the code works perfectly for
a user who should never have been allowed in.

ACCESS CONTROL — Doors that open for the wrong person.
Broken access controlInsecure direct object referenceMissing authorization checkCross-site request forgeryMass assignmentWeak token verificationSessions that never expireClickjackingOpen redirect
WHY IT MATTERS

Ownership checks are judged against how the rest of your codebase already does it, not against a generic pattern.

Credentials in the open, and crypto
that only looks strong.

Keys committed to source, passwords hashed with something
broken a decade ago, randomness anyone can predict.

SECRETS & CRYPTO — Credentials in the open, and crypto that only looks strong.
Hardcoded credentialsBroken cryptographic algorithmsWeak password hashingPredictable randomnessSecrets stored in the clearUnencrypted transport
WHY IT MATTERS

Ownership checks are judged against how the rest of your codebase already does it, not against a generic pattern.

The settings that quietly widen
the blast radius.

Individually minor. Together, the difference between an incident
and a breach.

EXPOSURE & CONFIG — The settings that quietly widen the blast radius.
Sensitive data in error responsesSecrets written to logsVerbose stack tracesDebug mode left onPermissive CORSUnsafe cookie flagsMissing rate limitingDeprecated unsafe APIs
WHY IT MATTERS

Reported with the severity they actually carry in context, rather than a fixed score per rule.

The bug that only occurs, when two
things happen at once.

Races, leaks and memory faults. The failures that survive code
review, because reading the code line by line cannot reveal them.

CONCURRENCY & MEMORY — The bug that only occurs, when two things happen at once.
Race conditionsTime-of-check to time-of-useNull dereferenceUse after freeDouble freeBuffer overflowInteger overflowInfinite recursionInfinite loopsMemory leaksResource leaksOff-by-one errorsMissing await
WHY IT MATTERS

Reported with the severity they actually carry in context, rather than a fixed score per rule.

Code that runs fine, and is still wrong.

Races, leaks and memory faults. The failures that survive code
review, because reading the code line by line cannot reveal them.

CORRECTNESS — Code that runs fine, and is still wrong.
Ownership checks that can be skippedAuthorization bypassed by workflow orderFields a client should never setData exposed beyond its audienceTiming gaps between check and action
WHY IT MATTERS

Kept separate from security findings, so a style issue can never crowd out something that matters.

Ship at agent
speed, without the dread.